ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the medium-term clinical effects of arthroscopic double row repair between traumatic and degenerative medium supraspinatus tear.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 23 patients who had been treated for traumatic or degenerative medium supraspinatus tear by the same arthroscopic double row repair and postoperative rehabilitation at Sports Medicine Center, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University between January 2015 and August 2020. They were assigned into 2 groups according to different tears. In the traumatic group of 8 cases of traumatic medium supraspinatus tear, there were 5 males and 3 females with an age of (46.1±4.3) years and a tear size of (1.3±1.0) cm 2. In the degenerative group of 15 cases of degenerative medium supraspinatus tear, there were 4 males and 11 females with an age of (59.9±8.1) years and a tear size of (4.1±1.1) cm 2. At preoperation and the last follow-up, the shoulder pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), and the shoulder function by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST); the improvements in active range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder were recorded at the last follow-up. Results:The 2 groups were comparable because there was no significant difference between them in the general clinical data ( P>0.05). The traumatic and degenerative groups were followed up for (40.3±11.2) and (36.4±12.4) months, respectively. At the last follow-up, the improvements in range of anterior flexion and internal rotation vertebral rank in the degenerative group [55.3°±33.6° and (4.1±1.3) ranks] were significantly greater than those in the traumatic group [27.5°±22.5° and (2.3±1.9) ranks] ( P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the VAS, ASES, Constant-Murley, and SST scores in the degenerative group were improved respectively by (3.7±0.8), (40.9±14.0), (38.4±9.4), and (6.5±1.4) points compared with their preoperative values, significantly greater than those in the traumatic group [(2.3±0.7), (19.6±14.6), (19.2±7.9), and (3.8±0.7) points] ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Arthroscopic double row repair can achieve significant medium-term improvements in shoulder function for both traumatic and degenerative medium supraspinatus tears, but the improvements may be grater for the degenerative ones.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the mid-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vertical mattress suturing for shoulder recurrent anterior dislocation combined with joint laxity.Methods:A retrospective case series study was performed on the clinical data of 11 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with joint laxity admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University from January 2018 to September 2021. The patients included 10 males and 1 female, aged 18-38 years [(22.8±5.5)years]. All the patients received treatment with arthroscopic vertical mattress suturing. The Oxford shoulder instability score, Rowe shoulder instability score, and simple shoulder test (SST) score were compared before operation, at 6 months after operation and at the final follow-up. The degree of joint capsule laxity and length of capsular redundancy (evaluated by MRI) were compared before operation and at the final follow-up. The results of the supine apprehension test, re-dislocation and postoperative complications such as iatrogenic vascular and nerve injuries were observed at the final follow-up. Also, the correlation between the radiological changes in the joint capsule and the shoulder function was analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient.Results:All the patients were followed up for 20-64 months [(40.7±18.6)months]. Before operation, at 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up, the values of Oxford shoulder instability score were (41.2±4.7)points, (49.5±3.0)points and (57.6±3.0)points; the values of Rowe shoulder instability score were (28.6±9.5)points, (77.7±7.2)points and (94.1±10.9)points; and the values of SST score were (7.6±1.3)points, (9.8±1.0)points and (11.6±0.9)points, respectively. The Oxford shoulder instability score, Rowe shoulder instability score and SST at 6 months after operation and at the final follow-up were significantly better than those before operation, and those at the final follow-up were significantly better than those at 6 months after operation (all P<0.05). The MRI showed that the degree of joint capsular laxity and length of capsular redundancy were 1.5±0.2 and (19.7±2.5)mm before operation and were 1.3±0.2 and (12.9±3.7)mm at the final follow-up, respectively ( P<0.05 or 0.01). The supine apprehension test was negative at the final follow-up, with no re-dislocation or postoperative complications such as iatrogenic vascular or nerve injuries. Correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between the degree of joint capsular laxity and the Oxford shoulder instability score ( r=-0.62, P<0.05) and that of the length of capsular redundancy with the Oxford shoulder instability score ( r=-0.80, P<0.01), the Rowe shoulder stability score ( r=-0.73, P<0.01) and the SST score ( r=-0.75, P<0.01). Conclusions:Arthroscopic vertical mattress suturing has good mid-term clinical outcome for recurrent shoulder anterior dislocation combined with joint laxity, improving the shoulder function and reducing complications, wihch is associated with decreased joint capsule laxity and length of capsular redundancy.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the mid-term clinical outcomes between traumatic stiff shoulder and frozen shoulder after arthroscopic capsule release combined with subacromial space recovery.Methods:From January 2014 to December 2019, 55 patients were treated at Sports Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University for limited range of shoulder motion. Of them, 22 suffered from traumatic stiff shoulder (7 males and 15 females) (group A) and 33 from frozen shoulder (10 males and 23 females) (group B). All patients were treated with arthroscopic 270° capsule release combined with subacromial space recovery. Shoulder pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and shoulder function by Constant score before operation and at the final follow-up. The 2 groups were compared in improvements in flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation of the shoulder.Results:No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in gender, age, course of disease, preoperative internal rotation or external rotation of the shoulder ( P>0.05). Preoperative VAS score [2.5(2.0, 3.3) points] and Constant score [(33.7±9.6) points] in group A were significantly lower than those in group B [4.0(3.0,5.5) points and (45.8±12.3) points] ( P<0.05). No complication like infection or nerve injury was found during follow-ups. All the incisions healed at the first stage. The follow-up time averaged 37.0 months (from 20 to 79 months). At the last follow-up, VAS scores [1.0(1.0, 1.0) points and 1.0(1.0, 1.0) points] and Constant scores [(87.0±3.2) points and (85.7±4.3) points] for both groups were significantly improved compared with their preoperative values [2.5(2.0,3.3)分points and 4.0(3.0,5.5) points for VAS; (33.7±9.6) points and (45.8±12.3) points for Constant score] ( P<0.05). Compared with preoperation, the improvements at the last follow-up were 99.3°±19.9° and 83.3°±27.7° in shoulder anteflexion and 102.0°±21.5° and 83.9°±32.8° in abduction for groups A and B, with greater improvements in group A; the improvements in VAS score for groups A and B were 1.0(1.0, 2.3) points and 3.0(2.0, 4.5) points, with greater improvements in group B; the improvements in Constant score were (53.3±9.5) points and (39.8±12.9) points for groups A and B, with greater improvements in group A. The above comparisons all showed a significant difference between the 2 groups ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Arthroscopic 270° capsule release combined with subacromial space recovery can lead to good mid-term clinical outcomes similar for both traumatic stiff shoulder and frozen shoulder. However, the improvements in flexion, abduction and Constant score may be greater for traumatic stiff shoulder than for frozen shoulder.